There's has been a lot of talk about who should've won this fight. Everyone says..."clearly Shogun should've won". Why tho? I mean, yeah he had some devastating leg kicks to the legs and body but, does that fully determine being in control of a fight? Every leg or body kick Shogun gave, Lyoto countered with a straight to Shoguns chin. Now, which of the two attacks are more effective in KO'ing their opponent? I'm not Pro-Lyoto in this fight I'm just trying to find out why people didn't give any credit to his attacks. They may not have been as hard and obvious as Shogun's attacks but, I take into account the effectiveness and accuracy of the attack. It was anyones fight to win but, to me I think Machida did just enough to take the "W". What are your thoughts?.....
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
October 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I keep hearing people say that this fight should have gone differently, but ultimately there's no changing the results of a fight. I think the true problem lies within the MMA scoring structure.
ReplyDelete